Objective Thinking Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

prey Thinking - Research Paper ExampleAs a issuing of adopting this approach you live in a child handle bubble with the world step to the foreside oneself and you are alone concerned with the effects you have on the outside world and vice versa. This paper aims to 1. Define documental experience, as opposed to subjective experience 2. Describe the experience of an objective thinker 3. Explore the guess of training adolescents to think objectively and 4. Explore the connection between thinking objectively and language. Isolating Objective Experience Bothereau (2009), in explaining atomism and atelic conceptualization, subscribed to the theorization of experience, in which experience can be examine and understood as a theoretical entity. At the same time, it is everything and everywhere, observable as well as unobservable. Bothereau goes on to compare the theories in question to Whiteheads (1920) sense-awareness continuum, in which sense-perception is possible only with a divis ion of the continuum, of a part objectified experience. Many theorists, as well as those in the practical sciences like medicine, take into account two components of experience the objective and the subjective. While the patients blood compress is objective and can be validated using a sphygmomanometer, his experience of pain is subjective and cannot be perfectly transferred through Nagels observer empathy (1974, in Baars, 2996). Baars (1996) advocated for such practical criteria to understand subjectivity. Indeed, the common motive against physicalism is that an ideal, complete physical description of a living human being still leaves out that persons subjective conscious experience, or what it was like to be that person (Rudd, 1997). Is it possible to take away subjective experience? Watt (2004) argued against the view that cognition and emotion are counter-posed to each other. Instead, cognition is an adjunct of emotion, which is an extension of homeostasis. The brains functi ons are made possible through integration of systems from top to back end of the neuroaxis. Biologic proof is in the neural connections between thalamocortical brain systems and many subcortical (basal forebrain, diencephalic, and midbrain-reticular) systems. He goes on to explain that, past early infancy, much of human consciousness consists of emotion-and-cognition amalgams, citing music and art as examples of activating emotion by cognition. Sutherland (2001) also commented on the indispensability of emotion in decision-making, as conclude by many theories from stimulus-response and behavioralism, symbolic logic and representation in any medium, to naturalism. He recounted Damasios (1994) findings that patients with legal injury to the orbitofrontal cortex, the area of the brain that deals with social emotions, were completely unable to make decisions. If emotions, as judgments on what is perceived, are categorize as subjective experience, and much of human consciousness cons ists of emotion-and-cognition amalgams, then it is not possible to completely break up subjective from objective experience. However, there are stoic individuals, or those who have mastered emotive self-regulation (not affective elimination), at least for a time. The next question would then be whether it is possible to hardwire the brain to think primarily objectively, which will be explored in the latter part of the paper.