The War on Polio and Other Wars Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

The fight on Polio and separate Wars - Essay ExampleThe war on polio was waged against the disease through the democratic effort of past death chair Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who is a polio victim himself. The war on polio became a huge victory because of his efforts. However, aside from polio there were other wars waged by America and many of them did not attain the analogous success as the war on polio perhaps because of what the other administrations failed to do. The joint efforts of the government and the mess themselves helped in the success of the war against polio. Former U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was afflicted with polio since 1921 and even until he became President in 1933. In 1937, Roosevelt, partly because of his own affliction and perhaps because of his genuine concern for children affected by the polio virus, instituted the National instauration for Infantile Paralysis (Kluger). The National Foundation used the latest advertising, investment trus t raising, and research to find a cure for polio, or perhaps some management techniques, and most of all(a) to reduce the disease into something that should not be feared (Oshinsky 5). The war on polio became successful because it was all nearly democratic effort and was greatly supported by people from all sectors, as the whole American nation participated in the annual galas held in the whole country during Roosevelts birthday. ... Thus, the case of polio touch on everyone. The people whose responsibility is to find a cure for it were under a huge pressure not only from the President and also from the whole nation, and so its success was inevit able-bodied. As the National Foundations director of research from 1946 to 1953, Harry Weaver deserves much of the credit for the development of the vaccine against polio. Moreover, his efforts at convincing Jonas Salk to work on the cure for polio virus instead of influenza were greatly subservient to the success of the vaccine. Aside f rom Weavers convincing power, the foundations first check for Salk amounting to $41,000 addition money from other sources also greatly helped (Oshinsky 112,116). Nevertheless, the main factor, perhaps, that made America win the war on polio was its efforts to cooperate with other countries, and even with the Soviet Union, and to set aside political differences first onwards medical concerns. From 1963 to 1999, the Sabin live vaccine proved to be more efficient than the Salk killed vaccine because the positive results were quick in the former. However, since the whole country was then already using the Salk vaccine, Sabin decided to test his vaccine in the late 1950s in the Belgian Congo and in the Soviet Union, despite the Cold War and the political tension between the United States and the Russian country (Two Vaccines). With such diplomacy and urgency, countries were able to set aside political differences first and learned how to develop a mutual agreement to revolve around on the more urgent issue at hand. Thus, the war on polio was won. The war on AIDS is not as successful as the war on polio because of several reasons but one of them is the growing hesitation of the American government to